Mantle Restaked ETH
mETH receipt restaked across EigenLayer, Symbiotic, Karak
Watch
Adequate now, but with weaknesses worth watching.
Risk dimensions
Four deterministic scores (0–100). Expand any dimension for the cited rationale — every claim links to its on-chain source.
Averaged with equal 25% weight, the four scores give a composite of 64/100, which the grade ladder maps to BBB (band 60–69). Confidence (85) is a separate measure of how much evidence was readable — not a second score.
Overall
cmETH earns a BBB grade (composite 64/100) reflecting strong, anchor-level liquidity offset by moderate scores across collateral, contract, and oracle dimensions. The collateral profile is mixed: mETH receipts restaked across EigenLayer, Symbiotic, and Karak [1] add layered slashing and counterparty exposure, attested via an off-chain prover with on-chain settlement [2].
Contract risk is contained but not eliminated — verified source [8] and a pausable [11] transparent proxy [9] are governed by a 6-of-14 Gnosis Safe [7] with no timelock [12]. Oracle reliance on a single restaked-balance proof system [13] with a wide 24h staleness window [14] is the other key constraint, while deep Mantle and parent TVL of $750M each [16][17] anchors liquidity.
Confidence is reduced by missing issuer/collateral, custodian, and timelock disclosures.
Reasoning verification
Re-fetch the reasoning JSON from IPFS, hash it in your browser, and check it against the hash stored on-chain.
On-chain record
- Grade (uint8)
- BBB · 3
- Reasoning hash
- 0x3dd48d65…61c29065
- IPFS cid
- bafkreig…pcuy3y ↗
- Agent identity
- ERC-8004 #114 ↗
- Ingest block
- 97,287,606
- Model
- claude-opus-4-8
- Contract
- 0xF16d…606D ↗