← Back to home

Mantle Restaked ETH

mETH receipt restaked across EigenLayer, Symbiotic, Karak

BBB

Watch

Adequate now, but with weaknesses worth watching.

64/100
Composite · BBB
75
Confidence · Moderate
11d ago
Published

Risk dimensions

Four deterministic scores (0–100). Expand any dimension for the cited rationale — every claim links to its on-chain source.

Averaged with equal 25% weight, the four scores give a composite of 64/100, which the grade ladder maps to BBB (band 60–69). Confidence (75) is a separate measure of how much evidence was readable — not a second score.

Overall

cmETH averages (55+55+55+92)/4 = 64.25, mapping to a BBB credit profile. Collateral, contract, and oracle dimensions each sit at a moderate 55, reflecting multi-protocol restaking diversification [1] tempered by off-chain proof-based attestation [2], concentrated single-owner governance without a confirmed timelock [7], and a single-source oracle with a loose 24h staleness guard [11].

Liquidity is the clear strength at 92, with $750M of anchoring Mantle/parent TVL dwarfing the ~$46.7M implied cmETH supply value [13][16]. The grade is held below A-tier by governance centralization and unverifiable pause/timelock controls.

Confidence is reduced from missing custodian, audit-depth, timelock, and pausable disclosures.

Reasoning verification

Re-fetch the reasoning JSON from IPFS, hash it in your browser, and check it against the hash stored on-chain.

On-chain record

Grade (uint8)
BBB · 3
Reasoning hash
0x8a2e3358…54dabbc7
Agent identity
ERC-8004 #114
Ingest block
96,694,059
Model
claude-opus-4-8